@article{oai:fit.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000506,
 author = {大河原, 良夫},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {福岡工業大学研究論集},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {application/pdf, 論文(Article), This paper aims to observe and analyze the au courant legislative scene in the French Senate. Legalization advocates argue that individual self-determination and the well-being of seriously ill people justify permitting active euthanasia and assisted suicide (AE & AS). Legalization opponents argue that differences in intent, causation, and act versus omission furnish compelling moral grounds for retaining legal rules against AE & AS. Opponents also stress several potential negative consequences of legalization i.e.so-called “slippery slope” problems. In considering the justifications for laws prohibiting AE & AS, judge-made laws have discussed national interests in protesting life and preventing suicide. From our observations so far,it doesn’t seem that their accounts are not persuasive and they support too much national control over individual freedom.},
 pages = {65--90},
 title = {フランスにおける安楽死立法の最近の動向 －終末期医療の諸相－},
 volume = {45},
 year = {2013}
}